Following Holy Pascha, at the invitation of His Grace Bishop Kyrillos, Bishop of Milan and Papal Deputy for All Europe, Abba Seraphim and the priestly members of the Synod of the British Orthodox Church, travelled to Northern Italy for a retreat in the Coptic Orthodox Diocese of Milan.
Arriving in Milan on 22 April, Abba Seraphim and Fathers Simon Smyth, David Seeds and Peter Farrington, were received at Linate airport by Bishop Kyrillos and clergy, who accompanied them to St. Shenouda the Archimandrite Monastery at Lacchiarella. The next morning, being the traditional British date for the celebration of St. George’s Day, Abba Seraphim and his clergy celebrated the Divine Liturgy of St. James in the presence of Bishop Kyrillos, some of his priests and the monks of the monastery. Later, accompanied by Father Raffaele Gebrail, they were entertained to lunch in Milan with Engineer Salama Salama before being accompanied by Father Antonios Ava Shenouti on the train to Venice, where they dined with Bishop Kyrillos.
The next day, accompanied by Father Antonios, they visited the Basilica of St. Marco and prayed at the tomb of the saint at the high altar. They then visited the Church of St. Zaccaria to pray at the shrines of St. John the Forerunner’s father, the priest Zechariah, as well as those of St. Athanasius the Apostolic. Venice is rich in relics of the saints, those of St. Mark having been stolen from Alexandria by Venetian merchants in 828, although a portion of the relics were returned to Pope Kyrillos VI by Pope Paul VI of Rome. Similarly in 1973 Pope Paul sent a portion of the relics of St. Athanasius to the late Pope Shenouda III in a fraternal gesture. The party ended their tour on foot at the Cathedral of St. Pietro in Castello, where they viewed the ancient throne of St. Peter, which had originally stood in Antioch. In the late afternoon they visited the site of the new Cathedral in Campalto, just outside the ancient city of Venice, where they joined Bishop Kyrillos and prayed for the successful completion of the work.
Returning to Milan on 25 April they lunched with Salama Salama’s son, Tariq, and his wife Christina, who then accompanied them (with Father Raffaele) to some of the significant sites in the city. As it was Independence Day in Italy, the streets were very busy with holiday makers and marchers. They prayed at the shrine of St. Ambrose, before visiting St. Maria dei Miracoli, the Duomo and the Basilica of St. Babila, named after St. Babylas, Patriarch of Antioch, who was martyred in the Decian persecution of 254.
The following morning Abba Seraphim and his priests assisted Bishop Kyrillos perform the marriage of Shady and Guiliana, followed by St. Basil’s Liturgy. This was a fitting climax to a blessed retreat during which the bishops and clergy of the two dioceses shared many insights of their respective ministries and a profound sense of fraternal love which binds them together.
The Holy Synod of the Coptic Orthodox Church, gathered on 8 June 2010 at the Papal residence and chaired by His Holiness Pope Shenouda III along with the attendance of eighty-one Metropolitans and Bishops and the endorsement of nine fathers who did not attend, declares that the Coptic Church respects the law, yet it cannot approve rulings that are against the Bible and against the religious freedom that is promised to us by the Constitution. The church also declares that for us Matrimony is a holy sacrament and a purely religious matter, not a mere administrative procedure.
The Islamic Sharia declares “govern them according to their beliefs”, likewise, the word “according to their tenet” appears in all legislation pertaining to the Personal Statute. Law 462/1955, rulings of the Court of Cassation, the Supreme Constitutional Court and the Criminal Court, all mentioned that the Patriarch is not a public official.
As for imposing on the Church, religious matters that are against our laws, i.e. against the Bible and the church canons, this is something that our consciences cannot approve and we definitely cannot execute.
For the re-marriage of divorced people, it is a strictly religious matter that is governed by the Bible.
Metropolitan of Damietta, Kafr El-Sheikh and Barary
Secretary of the Holy Synod
Pope Shenouda III
Pope of Alexandria and Patriarch of the See of St Mark
An emergency meeting of the Holy Synod of the Coptic Orthodox Church has been called in Cairo for 8 June 2010 to discuss the recent judgement of Egypt’s Supreme Administrative Court concerning the remarriage in church of divorced persons.
Writing to H.E. Metropolitan Bishoy, the General Secretary of the Holy Synod, Abba Seraphim, who is unable to attend, has asked that he should convey to His Holiness Pope Shenouda his assurance that “the British Orthodox clergy and people are in complete agreement with his statements concerning the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony and his fidelity to the scriptural injunctions concerning its indissolubility. Whilst we respect the rights of governments to legislate in matters civil, it belongs to the Church alone to administer or withhold the holy sacraments.”
On 29 May 2010 Egypt’s Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) rejected an appeal by His Holiness Pope Shenouda against a ruling requiring the Coptic Orthodox Church to allow its faithful to remarry following a divorce. The judgement stated, “By law, a Christian can remarry and the constitution guarantees his rights to have a (new) family. “The right of every Egyptian to form a family is enshrined in the Egyptian constitution,” said Judge Mohamed El-Husseini. “The appeal made by Pope Shenouda III to prevent Copts from remarrying is therefore rejected.” Pope Shenouda III’s Sunday sermon contained a response to the SAC ruling. “We respect the judicial system,” he said. “However, it is not binding on the church. Marriage is not only a religious matter, it is one of the Orthodox Church’s seven sacraments. Nothing on earth will force us to abide by anything that contradicts Biblical teaching.”
In 1955, however, Family Status Law 462 was adopted and applied to all Egyptians. Accordingly, the various community courts were abolished and were replaced by civil courts (personal status courts). Article 7 of the law stipulates the application of the religious basis for divorce (Shari’a for Muslims, and the corresponding religious principles or regulations for each of the non-Muslim communities), provided that both spouses belong to the same denomination. Unfortunately the Egyptian courts have applied a personal status code issued by the Coptic Orthodox Maglis Melli (Community) Council, composed of laymen, in 1938. For the Coptic Orthodox, Articles 50 to 58 of Law 462 stipulates that a plaintiff may be granted divorce if his or her spouse commits or falls under one of the following categories stipulated in the 1938 personal status code: adultery; conversion to another religion; absence for a period of five consecutive years with no news of whereabouts; being judged and sentenced to seven years imprisonment; mental illness, a contagious illness, or impotence (with no recovery for at least three years); serious domestic violence; debauchery or immoral behaviour; separation for at least three years as a result of untenable marital life and joining a monastic order.
This code was issued at a time widely regarded as an era of weakness in the Coptic Church which nevertheless consistently opposed the code on grounds that it went against the teachings of the Bible. Christian couples who sought a quick divorce had the option of filing for divorce according to Islamic shar’ia where a man may single-handedly divorce his wife for any reason. All it took was for one of the spouses to change his or her denomination and the man to declare his wish for divorce and take the matter to court. Since the couple would then belong to two different denominations, and there being no unified law for Christians, the court would apply Islamic shar’ia and divorce would be instantly granted. In October 1962 Pope Kyrillos VI demanded the amendment of the 1938 code. In 1971 Pope Shenouda III, as one of the first acts of his papacy, issued Papal Decree No. 7. This ordered the Clerical Council for Family Affairs (CCFA) to make the rules stricter and to only grant permission to remarry in cases in which a court’s divorce ruling was essentially based on adultery and denying remarriage permits for couples who divorced through the civil courts, unless the divorce was based on adultery.
In 1978 Christian leaders met together and proposed an act unifying the personal status law for Christians. All the heads of the various Churches in Egypt signed the act. In 1980 the act was submitted to the Justice Ministry for presentation to Parliament as new legislation. Nothing further was done about it, however, and when, in 1998, Pope Shenouda III drew the attention of then Justice Minister Farouq Seif al-Nasr, the latter asked for the act to be again officially presented to the ministry, which the Church accordingly did. Yet again the act was shelved.
Pope Shenouda III has repeatedly stated that no power on earth can force the church to go contrary to the teachings of the Bible, and these clearly state that there can be no divorce except in case of adultery, a principle which is non-existent in civil law. The administrative court ruling was based upon the Egyptian Constitution which stipulates that every citizen has the right to marry and form a family. Munssif Naguib, the pope’s lawyer, has commented that the number of divorcees reportedly seeking remarriage is exaggerated; some claim they are anywhere between 50,000 and 100,000 while the actual number of cases before the Coptic patriarchate does not exceed a few thousand. However, in October 2006 a report issued by the commissioners of the Supreme Administrative Court demanded that it should issue a final ruling to annul the primary ruling. The report explained that marriage is a sacrament in the Church, can only be contracted according to religious rites and rituals which must be conducted through a priest, and thus the Church alone had the right to grant marriage annulments and remarriage permits. Nothing, the report declared, should force the Church to go against its beliefs.
On 23 February, 2007, the High Administrative Court, presided by Judge Mohamed El-Husseini and including five other member judges (all Muslims), ruled in the case no. 13719/59 that following a divorce ruling by a civil family status court, the Coptic Orthodox Church was required to issue permission to remarry in the Church. Beyond the paradox of the seeming interference in the Church’s teachings and rituals, the ruling stated that it was “based on Shari’a–considering that it was the general and public legal order whose application is obligatory.” The ruling came after two Egyptian Copts, Hani Wasfi and Magdi William, began a case contesting the Pope’s refusal to issue marriage permits that would allow them to remarry after their first marriages ended in divorce. In March 2008 it was against this ruling that Pope Shenouda appealed.
Specifically civil marriage alone, without a religious ceremony, is not recognized in Egypt. Under Egypt’s personal laws, marriage and divorce proceedings are based on the couple’s religion. The Coptic Orthodox Church in Egypt does not recognise civil marriages nor does it recognise the second marriages of Copts whose initial divorce was granted in civil courts without its prior approval.
In a televised interview following the latest court ruling, Pope Shenouda said, “In family affairs, we don’t consider court verdicts, but biblical rules. Therefore, it isn’t the first time, I said before, we don’t allow marriage for the divorced, save according to the church teaching based upon the Bible and Church laws. Moreover, I read in newspapers, ‘The Pope prevents second marriages.’ I don’t do so. For example, widowers whose wives died can remarry. Someone who is divorced according to the Church laws, the innocent party can remarry. We only prevent it for those divorced against Biblical teachings. That’s the issue. If a person is a Christian, then he should behave according to the Christian laws. How can a person commit sin and ask us to marry him ? We cannot marry him. Therefore, we won’t marry those who want to marry by force. No to marriage by force. ….. If a person want a civil permit from a civil authority to get married, he can get married civilly if he wishes since he chose this way. But if he chose the Church he should abide by the Church laws. In such issues we are very serious. What does this mean ? We can never relent. If we relent we disobey our religion, which is impossible. If someone wants to marry he can marry freely, but away from us. Again, if someone tries to deceive any clergyman to marry him, the priest will be unfrocked and the married person won’t be allowed in the Church. Is it clear ? If anyone has an ear, let him hear.”
It was a great blessing to be able to celebrate two sacraments for Neil and Sue, who have been worshipping with us for some time, and had become catechumens as a mark of the seriousness of their intention to become Orthodox. Although our facilities are limited we were able to conduct the baptism in the Church using an inflatable baptistery, and after Neil and Sue had been received into the Church through immersion and chrismation, their legal marriage was blessed by the Orthodox sacrament of matrimony.
The double celebration was conducted on the 24th April, and Neil and Sue took the names Seraphim and Susanna in the Church. The following Sunday was a further milestone for them, and a blessing for Father Peter, when they received their first communion in the Orthodox Church.