Tares and Wheat - Printable Version
+- The British Orthodox Church - Fellowship Forum (http://britishorthodox.org/forum)
+-- Forum: General Lounge (http://britishorthodox.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+--- Forum: General Conversation (http://britishorthodox.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Tares and Wheat (/showthread.php?tid=389)
Tares and Wheat - Fr Gregory - 12-04-2010
Discerning Tares from Wheat
I was, albeit in a rather minor way, reminded this weekend of the value of good Scripture study. I saw a passing reference to the Parable of the Wheat and Tares, and, found myself wondering just what tares might be. I had, I suppose, always assumed they were just some form of generic weed.
So: first, what is the Greek word translated in English as either tares (a bit uncommonly old-fashioned now) or weeds? The Greek word is Î¶Î¹Î¶Î¬Î½Î¹Î± (zizania), plural of Î¶Î¹Î¶Î¬Î½Î¹Î¿Î½ (zizanion), and that is usually assumed to mean darnel. So, a specific species of plant. But can that possibly matter?
Indeed it does. Darnel is Lolium temulentum, a species of rye-grass, the seeds of which are a strong soporific poison. It is an annual plant that can grow up to a meter tall. It is commonly found in Syria and Israel in those areas in which wheat is grown. More importantly, it resembles wheat so strongly in appearance that it is widely known as ?false wheat?. Until both wheat and tares have grown to the point at which the ears appear they look the same. The ears of darnel are light and do not bend with the heaviness of the seed within them as do the ears of wheat. This explains the instruction given by the householder when his servants suggest that they dig up the weeds (tares):
?28?The servants said to him, ?Do you want us then to go and gather them up??
29 But he said, ?No, lest while you gather up the tares you also uproot the wheat with them.
30 Let both grow together until the harvest, and at the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, "First gather together the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them, but gather the wheat into my barn.??
It also explains the comment in the version of the parable found in the apocryphal ?Gospel of Thomas?: ?Jesus said The Father's kingdom is like a person who has good seed. His enemy came during the night and sowed weeds among the good seed. The person did not let the workers pull up the weeds, but said to them, 'No, otherwise you might go to pull up the weeds and pull up the wheat along with them.' For on the day of the harvest the weeds will be conspicuous, and will be pulled up and burned.?
The relevance of tares or darnel (as opposed to generic weeds) was known to the early Fathers. St Augustine in his commentary on St Matthew?s Gospel, noted:
?Between wheat and weeds is something called darnel, when the plant is in its early growth and there is no stalk yet. It looks like an ear of wheat, and the difference between them is hardly noticeable.?
But, still, why this focus on darnel? All the parables of The Lord appear to be simple tales with easy-to-understand meanings. But they are all, in fact, very sophisticated stories, with many layers of meaning, in which sometimes minor details, properly understood, bring out the most important teaching.
This parable is often read as a simple story of good (wheat) and evil (weeds) which must be separated. But life relatively rarely offers such easy choices and, when it does, it requires no great insight to understand what should be done. If the wheat was contaminated, say, with a plant bearing no resemblance to wheat, and which quickly produced scarlet flowers, it would be easy to distinguish the good wheat from the bad weeds. The weeds could be pulled out with no risk to the wheat.
But darnel looks like wheat, grows like wheat, is all but indistinguishable (except to the very knowing eye) from wheat until both plants have reached the stage of ripeness immediately prior to the harvest. One produces a heavy head of life-giving grain and is bent over with the weight; the other produces many poisonous seeds and remains upright.
One can readily say: life?s like that! That which has the appearance of good may, eventually, reveal itself to be evil. That which seems to have the potential for fruitfulness may grow into that which is deadly or delusory. What appears to be a life of spiritual devotion may be a life of pretence and deception. Within our own lives we may be deceived by the appearance of ?wheat? (all too often because ?wheat? is what we want to see) only to find out, eventually, that it was ?darnel?.
In the parable, the householder is obviously a skilled and knowledgeable farmer: he recognizes the darnel almost as soon as it begins to grow, and can therefore plan how he will deal with it. He does not, as his servants suggest, rush in to weed out the darnel immediately for fear of destroying the wheat as well. He will wait until the distinction between the two is easier to make, and will then have his servants carefully separate the two plants. Then even the darnel may be put to some use: it was traditionally bundled up and dried for use as fuel.
The reference in the parable to burning is not necessarily to burning as waste. In our modern affluent society we all too often assume that those things that cannot be used for our purposes have no use at all and are rubbish. This is how these words in this parable are often misunderstood. ?Gather together the tares and bind them in bundles to burn them? is assumed to mean burn them as waste, as useless rubbish. But at the time Jesus spoke these words, tares and many other plants were collected and dried and used as fuel for cooking and heating. They could not be used for food, but that did not mean that they had no use at all.
That which is not useful, or which may even be harmful, for one purpose can be transformed, made useful for another purpose.
The farmer demonstrates a model of spiritual discernment: distinguishing between two things that are virtually identical in appearance, but in reality opposite. This is also a model of the spiritual life: discernment followed by a sound strategy for addressing the problem.
One of the key virtues of the Christian spiritual life is discernment. It is often assumed to mean the power of discerning others, and so it may be. But care needs to be taken to distinguish judgment from discernment. We can all too easily judge others, assuming, for example, that they are tares when they may be wheat. We can all too easily exercise false discernment in relation to ourselves, assuming the tares in our lives are actually wheat.
Discernment requires two characteristics. The first is to be watchful. ?Nepsis? is the Greek word which means to be watchful, alert. In St Luke 12:37 Jesus says: ?Blessed are those servants whom the Lord when He comes, shall find watching.?
St Symeon the New Theologian wrote
?Our whole soul should have at every moment a clear eye, able to watch and notice the thoughts entering our heart from the evil one and repel them.?
The Philokalia teaches:
?Vigilance is a firm control of the mind. Post it at the door of the heart, so that it sees marauding thoughts as they come, hears what they say, and knows what these robbers are doing, and what images are being projected?.so as to seduce the mind by phantasy.?
But someone may be watchful or vigilant, and not know what to look for. The second requirement of discernment is knowledgeable judgment. We must watch, but we must know what to look for, and we must be able to distinguish between that which is good and that which is bad, that which provides nourishment and that which poisons.
Think of the farmer in the parable. Instead of rushing in to rip out what might be tares, but what might equally be wheat, and, in the process trampling on the wheat, he exercised discernment. This involved patience, clear vision, knowledge and strategy. The farmer needed to wait until it was possible to discern the tares from the wheat. The farmer needed to be able to see clearly the characteristics of each plant. And the famer needed knowledge to distinguish between the two. Finally, the farmer needed a strategic plan, a deliberate system of action to implement that which his vision and knowledge had shown him needed to be done. Discernment without action may be some sort of theoretical academic gift, but it produces no practical results.
Every person?s life is like the farmer?s field in which wheat and tares grow. We need watchfulness, we need knowledge, we need discernment, we need patience and we need deliberate action. What is it in our lives that we might think of as ?wheat? that may be ?tares?? Is our patience actually indifference? Is our enthusiastic piety actually pride? Is our manifest humility actually a desire to attract attention to our ?spirituality??
Until, like the wise good farmer we can distinguish between things which appear to be the same, we run the risk of allow ?tares? to flourish to the detriment of ?wheat?. We need to develop ? and to pray for ? the gift of discernment that we may develop an informed strategy to ensure that our ?tares? are carefully removed so that our individual harvest may be rich.
- Fr Gregory - 22-04-2010
What you say in reference to yourself should be understood to refer to all of us!
How often, even unconsciously, do we desire to be seen as what we are not.....or to flaunt our ?spirituality? by, as it were, adopting bigger phylacteries and broader fringes (Mat 23:5) or ostentatiously giving alms (Mat 6:2) or carefully measuring out our obligations (Lk 11:42) while overlooking love and justice. Or engaging in some sort of ?spiritual Olympics? by fasting longer, praying more, prostrating at a gymnastic rate, reciting more psalms, attending more Church services ? and making sure others know about our ?holiness?.
However, please be gentle with yourself! Beating ourselves up over our manifest imperfections can be just another form of pride. I recall once attending a Protestant service in which a ?sin Olympics? appeared to be enacted....everyone competing to be more wicked than their neighbours, more hopeless, more depraved, committing more and worse sins, and being further than anyone else from God.
We are the sons and daughters of the Living God, created in His image and fashioned after His likeness, although (as the magnificent declaration in the Byzantine funeral rite states) marked with the wounds of sin. It is our striving, rather than our failing, that matters ? awareness and repentance and determination to be transformed is required, rather than bitter regret or self-flagellation.
Yes, good spiritual guidance is important, if not essential, both to preserve us from self-satisfaction as much as from self-pity. Sadly, the tradition of such spiritual guidance has been somewhat lost in modern times, and confession and absolution (although in themselves important) seem to have replaced a more important form of spiritual guidance. It was never the Orthodox tradition for confession and absolution to be along the traditional Roman Catholic lines (?I lied three times, swore seventeen times and felt lust in my heart twice....?). Orthodox penitence is not a sort of ?sin accounting?. It was always seen to be more a form of what we would now call ?spiritual psychotherapy?, helping the individual to overcome, move on, grow and move closer towards that which he or she was created to be.
I have been blessed by the gentle guidance of three ?spiritual directors? in my life. Two were lay women. The first (before I became Orthodox) was a wonderful Lutheran woman who, I only discovered years after her death, had studied with Carl Jung. The second was a Jewish psychotherapist. I had decided that since I was lecturing about psychotherapy in one of the courses I taught I should probably experience it! I went to check it out ? and stayed for the incredible guidance she gave me and the insights she assisted me to gain into my own faith. The third was an elderly, incredibly conservative Orthodox Priest, but one who moved from rigid arch-reactionary in outward things to gentle shepherd in spiritual guidance.
There are now some excellent texts on Orthodox ?spiritual psychotherapy? available in English, and some very good studies of the Orthodox tradition of spiritual guidance (the term I prefer to ?spiritual direction?). If you would like details of these, do let me know.
The most common spiritual advice I have to give to people might sound abrupt and improper: ?God is not an accountant!? Neither the running totals of sin nor of ?good works? is what matters. It is your developing relationship with God and the developing of your potential as His son or daughter that is important.
- Antony-Paul - 22-04-2010
Dear Father Gregory,
Thank you for these further thoughts. I suspect I may have fallen into the very trap of which you speak - though I was not intentionally seeking a view about my own weaknesses! This indeed illustrates the ease with which Satan can enter our lives and misdirect us.
I think my problem is not so much the specific sins I commit. I too suscribe to the 'God is not an accountant' view, even though I was educated by a priest along precisely those lines - a spiritual bank balance. No, my point is slightly different. My personal training over many years has given me plenty of stock answers for common questions. I can usually anticipate the advice being offered for common problems, both spiritual and as a health professional. The example of humility that I used, and continue with here, illustrates how difficult it is to separate sincerity from vanity, and it is this kind of distinction that besets us all the time.
This happens in many areas of life. For example, to carry out care work one is usually required to wear some form of uniform. This (inter alia) is to identify you to those for whom you care, but it can so easily become a badge that not only separates you from them, but also engenders the notion of superiority. The same can be true of clerical garb and vestments, and it must be extremely hard for clergy to guard against such temptations, especially when the laity insist on placing them on a pedestal. One may ask: how does the 'Servant of the servants of God' demonstrate servitude when clothed in magnificent vestments?
Jesus didn't have such clothing as far as we know - He had the simple robes of His culture. He managed to show how to serve, as well as how to lead and teach, purely by his words and behaviour. He showed no affectations, and did not show off that He was God. His claim to Godhead was clear, His claim to Kingship was clear, but He also allowed Himself to be truly humble. I am constantly reminded of Him washing the feet, and I cannot imagine myself doing that without thinking that I am impressing someone who is watching!
It is guarding against such insidious activity by Satan that I find so hard. Simply being aware of it is not enough for me. I am constantly asking Jesus to send Satan away, and find the Jesus prayer so helpful in this regard. I wonder what others find helpful in this quest that we all have for rejection of the Devil - not only in matters of humility which I have used as an example, but in all the other aspects of life which are potential minefields: rest and leisure/sloth, earning money and goods/acquisitiveness, etc. The more ideas the better.
- John Charmley - 23-04-2010
You touch on such an important aspect of our spiritual lives that your plea for as much advice as possible is one I would acho.
I think the key, in so far as there is a single one, is to be found in what Fr. Gregory says about our developing relationship with God.
How much time in the average day do we devote to this? And yet we know from our experiences in the world that relationships need to be 'worked on', they don't just happen. But how often is our relationship with God like a disfunctional marriage? We knows He love us, and we take Him for granted. He'll be there when we need Him, but of course, we are terrifically busy and don't always have the time to tell Him we love Him, or even to talk to Him; how fortunate we are that we know He'll understand this.
Maybe that's just me, of course :oops:
But I suspect it isn't. Of course He does love us, and, in fact, the only person who suffers in that kind of relationship is us, because we are not doing what Fr. Gregory implicitly recommends - that is developing a relationship. If I remember to talk to Him every morning, and to leave time to listen to what He is saying to me, and if I do the same in the evening, then there is some sort of development. If I make time to read His words and to think about them, there is some development.
But then the excuses come. I am fearfully busy (one of my students who consulted my secretary about a time for a meeting recently told me she was 'sorry to bother me' because she's seen how packed my diary was); that is true. But can I really not find even ten minutes a day? Of course I can. It takes me a couple of hours a day to drive to and from workl, and now Terry Wogan is gone from Radio 2 I have no excuse for not putting on a CD of Bible study or reflection, or just some Gregorian Chant.
And then, of course, I'm tired and don't have time in the evenings, family of something else calls. Then I remember that my spiritual and real life are, in fact, one. How do I relate to my wife and family? Am I in any way an icon of Christian life, however marred and obscured the picture might be? If I'm not, then there is a work there for me to do.
Over the years this seems to be the one thing I have learned, that any attempt to separate out my religious life from my real life induces failure in both. I can't just be a Christian on Sundays or when I am praying; I have to walk in His way every day, and I have to face the shame of frequent failure without it discouraging me from trying again.
At the very least, morning and evening prayers are an aid in helping me ground the rest of the day in Him.
It would be good to know from others how they handle these matters.